We are all familiar with the principle that a trial witness may be confronted with a prior inconsistent out-of-court statement on cross examination, which has implications in every trial where the ...
The primary stated purpose of the amendments is to restyle the rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout. The Texas Supreme Court recently ...
The landmark 1986 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, Commonwealth v. Brady, placed Pennsylvania among a minority of states that allowed prior inconsistent statements to be presented as substantive ...
St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch says, many witnesses to the shooting of Michael Brown made inconsistent statements to other statements they made.Nov. 25, 2014 ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback